CTRA vs. LNG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).

Performance

CTRA vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTRA vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc.	29.81%	6.68%	3.38%	8.72%	39.15%	23.50%	-4.33%	-20.78%	-21.07%	23.26%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	42.28%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	9.94%	29.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CTRA : $25.85B LNG : $59.28B
EPS CTRA : $2.26 LNG : $24.33
PE Ratio CTRA : 15.04 LNG : 11.34
PEG Ratio CTRA : 0.72 LNG : 0.06
PS Ratio CTRA : 9.39 LNG : 3.02
PB Ratio CTRA : 1.51 LNG : 7.49
Total Revenue (TTM) CTRA : $2.75B LNG : $19.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTRA : $1.66B LNG : $5.46B
EBITDA (TTM) CTRA : $4.84B LNG : $9.75B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRA achieves a 29.81% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 42.28% return. Over the past 10 years, CTRA has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 7.45%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 23.93% annualized return.

CTRA

• 1D: -3.47%
• 1M: 8.43%
• YTD: 29.81%
• 6M: 43.81%
• 1Y: 20.68%
• 3Y*: 15.05%
• 5Y*: 17.80%
• 10Y*: 7.45%

LNG

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: 10.81%
• YTD: 42.28%
• 6M: 19.47%
• 1Y: 20.58%
• 3Y*: 21.72%
• 5Y*: 32.08%
• 10Y*: 23.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CTRA vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTRA

CTRA Risk / Return Rank: 59
CTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 58

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 61
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTRA vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTRA	LNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	0.70	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	1.11	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.15	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	0.91	+0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.73	2.08	-0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTRA vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRA and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTRA	LNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	0.70	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	1.08	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.73	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.17	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between CTRA and LNG is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CTRA vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

CTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than LNG's 0.76% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc.	2.59%	3.34%	3.29%	4.58%	8.47%	5.89%	2.46%	2.01%	1.12%	0.59%	0.34%	0.45%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.76%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CTRA vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRA drawdown since its inception was -74.41%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRA and LNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTRA	LNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.41%	-97.84%	+23.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.04%	-22.34%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.25%	-24.87%	-8.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.56%	-57.53%	+4.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.58%	-7.10%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.01%	-43.34%	+16.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.36%	9.79%	+2.57%

Volatility

CTRA vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is 8.55%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that CTRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTRA	LNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.55%	11.79%	-3.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.22%	18.41%	+2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.28%	29.65%	+1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.21%	29.90%	+4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.51%	32.96%	+2.55%

Financials

CTRA vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coterra Energy Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CTRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of -446.00M and revenue of -2.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CTRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 695.00M and revenue of -2.82B, resulting in an operating margin of -24.7%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.74B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 83.7%.

CTRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Coterra Energy Inc. reported a net income of 368.00M and revenue of -2.82B, resulting in a net margin of -13.1%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.30B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 40.6%.