CTRA vs. LNG
Compare and contrast key facts about Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CTRA or LNG.
Correlation
The correlation between CTRA and LNG is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CTRA vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CTRA:
-0.13
LNG:
1.19
CTRA:
-0.03
LNG:
1.82
CTRA:
1.00
LNG:
1.21
CTRA:
-0.10
LNG:
1.48
CTRA:
-0.32
LNG:
4.15
CTRA:
9.54%
LNG:
5.63%
CTRA:
23.17%
LNG:
19.71%
CTRA:
-74.41%
LNG:
-97.84%
CTRA:
-25.69%
LNG:
-7.54%
Fundamentals
CTRA:
$18.06B
LNG:
$47.27B
CTRA:
$1.65
LNG:
$15.73
CTRA:
14.86
LNG:
13.39
CTRA:
44.67
LNG:
0.60
CTRA:
$5.45B
LNG:
$16.09B
CTRA:
$1.80B
LNG:
$9.35B
CTRA:
$3.52B
LNG:
$8.11B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTRA achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 23.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CTRA has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 0.31%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.
CTRA
-4.15%
-11.74%
-9.52%
-4.97%
11.76%
0.31%
LNG
23.64%
-5.33%
27.28%
22.91%
28.74%
11.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CTRA vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CTRA vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
CTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than LNG's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. | 3.55% | 4.58% | 10.13% | 5.89% | 2.46% | 2.01% | 1.12% | 0.59% | 0.34% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.15% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CTRA vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTRA drawdown since its inception was -74.41%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRA and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CTRA vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 6.30%. This indicates that CTRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CTRA vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coterra Energy Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities