PortfoliosLab logo
CTRA vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CTRA and LNG is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CTRA vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CTRA:

-0.51

LNG:

1.71

Sortino Ratio

CTRA:

-0.46

LNG:

2.23

Omega Ratio

CTRA:

0.94

LNG:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

CTRA:

-0.47

LNG:

2.33

Martin Ratio

CTRA:

-1.23

LNG:

7.36

Ulcer Index

CTRA:

11.29%

LNG:

6.98%

Daily Std Dev

CTRA:

29.74%

LNG:

29.16%

Max Drawdown

CTRA:

-74.41%

LNG:

-97.84%

Current Drawdown

CTRA:

-26.00%

LNG:

-7.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CTRA:

$19.61B

LNG:

$52.54B

EPS

CTRA:

$1.50

LNG:

$14.19

PE Ratio

CTRA:

17.11

LNG:

16.62

PEG Ratio

CTRA:

44.67

LNG:

2.10

PS Ratio

CTRA:

3.74

LNG:

3.40

PB Ratio

CTRA:

1.49

LNG:

9.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTRA:

$5.03B

LNG:

$16.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTRA:

$2.06B

LNG:

$7.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

CTRA:

$3.63B

LNG:

$6.53B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTRA achieves a -7.67% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CTRA has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of -1.12%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.


CTRA

YTD

-7.67%

1M

-9.59%

6M

-3.27%

1Y

-15.18%

5Y*

7.93%

10Y*

-1.12%

LNG

YTD

9.29%

1M

7.56%

6M

14.18%

1Y

49.56%

5Y*

40.52%

10Y*

12.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTRA vs. LNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTRA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTRA is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTRA is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTRA is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTRA is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTRA is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTRA is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CTRA vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CTRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTRA and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CTRA vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

CTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than LNG's 0.83% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
3.63%3.29%4.58%10.13%5.89%2.46%2.01%1.12%0.59%0.34%0.45%0.27%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.83%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CTRA vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTRA drawdown since its inception was -74.41%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTRA and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CTRA vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

CTRA vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coterra Energy Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
924.00M
5.44B
(CTRA) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items