CTLP vs. SUPV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CTLP (Cantaloupe, Inc.) and SUPV (Grupo Supervielle S.A.) are both stocks. CTLP operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while SUPV operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CTLP returned 9.60%/yr vs -1.04%/yr for SUPV. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CTLP vs. SUPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTLP achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly higher than SUPV's -19.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CTLP has outperformed SUPV with an annualized return of 9.60%, while SUPV has yielded a comparatively lower -1.04% annualized return.

CTLP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 5.46%
• 6M: 5.86%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 18.56%
• 5Y*: 0.22%
• 10Y*: 9.60%

SUPV

• 1D: -5.46%
• 1M: 19.75%
• YTD: -19.46%
• 6M: -18.77%
• 1Y: -24.62%
• 3Y*: 63.78%
• 5Y*: 33.76%
• 10Y*: -1.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTLP vs. SUPV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTLP Cantaloupe, Inc.	5.46%	11.67%	28.34%	70.34%	-51.01%	-15.27%	41.62%	90.23%	-60.10%	126.74%
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A.	-19.46%	-20.75%	281.41%	87.96%	11.80%	-6.59%	-41.46%	-57.01%	-70.23%	124.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CTLP and SUPV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2016	0.15

Fundamentals

EPS CTLP : $0.07 SUPV : -$72.13
PS Ratio CTLP : 1.93 SUPV : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) CTLP : $320.82M SUPV : $1.02T
Gross Profit (TTM) CTLP : $92.41M SUPV : $425.09B
EBITDA (TTM) CTLP : $24.24M SUPV : -$9.21B

Return for Risk

CTLP vs. SUPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTLP

CTLP Risk / Return Rank: 85
CTLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CTLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CTLP Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CTLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CTLP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

SUPV

SUPV Risk / Return Rank: 30
SUPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SUPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SUPV Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SUPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SUPV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTLP vs. SUPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) and Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTLP	SUPV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	-0.26	+1.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	0.26	+2.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.03	+0.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	-0.40	+3.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.31	-0.85	+10.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTLP vs. SUPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the SUPV Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTLP and SUPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTLP	SUPV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	-0.26	+1.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.48	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	-0.01	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	-0.01	-0.21

Drawdowns

CTLP vs. SUPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTLP drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SUPV drawdown of -95.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTLP and SUPV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTLP	SUPV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-95.98%	-4.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.26%	-62.45%	+52.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.07%	-75.20%	+40.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.69%	-75.20%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.71%	-95.98%	+13.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.55%	-68.20%	-31.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-99.10%	-66.99%	-32.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	29.36%	-25.48%

Volatility

CTLP vs. SUPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) is 2.20%, while Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) has a volatility of 23.34%. This indicates that CTLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTLP	SUPV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	23.34%	-21.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.90%	46.12%	-38.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.88%	95.28%	-70.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.27%	71.33%	-26.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.47%	72.27%	-13.80%

Dividends

CTLP vs. SUPV - Dividend Comparison

Neither CTLP nor SUPV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTLP Cantaloupe, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A.	0.00%	1.71%	1.12%	0.00%	0.71%	1.36%	1.79%	2.03%	1.32%	0.30%

Financials

CTLP vs. SUPV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cantaloupe, Inc. and Grupo Supervielle S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CTLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 78.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SUPV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a gross profit of 169.00M and revenue of 387.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

CTLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported an operating income of -767.00K and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.

SUPV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported an operating income of -15.76M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.

CTLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cantaloupe, Inc. reported a net income of -2.16M and revenue of 78.69M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

SUPV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a net income of -12.03M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTLP and SUPV in my portfolio?

CTLP and SUPV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTLP or SUPV?

SUPV has higher volatility (23.34%) compared to CTLP (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTLP dropped -99.98% vs SUPV's -95.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.