CTEX vs. WNTR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. CTEX is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, CTEX returned 45.57% vs 107.38% for WNTR. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CTEX charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

CTEX vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a -4.20% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.75% return.

CTEX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -16.09%
• 6M: -14.26%
• YTD: -4.20%
• 1Y: 45.57%
• 3Y*: 1.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.23%

WNTR

• 1D: 3.26%
• 1M: 8.13%
• 6M: 14.92%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 1Y: 107.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 47.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	$35.29K	$31.66K	$63.75K
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	$4.02M	$3.86M	$3.95M

CTEX vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	-4.20%	97.50%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	10.75%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEX and WNTR is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.41

Return for Risk

CTEX vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CTEX

CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 36
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 75
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CTEX vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEX	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	2.12	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.37	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.32	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	2.71	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.44	6.87	-3.43

CTEX vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEX and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CTEX vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEX	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.31%	-42.65%	-27.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.09%	-42.65%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.34%	-9.64%	-24.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.28%	-20.18%	-21.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.38%	16.81%	-4.43%

Volatility

CTEX vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a higher volatility of 15.81% compared to YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 14.85%. This indicates that CTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTEX	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.81%	14.85%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.40%	47.43%	-12.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.84%	54.68%	-7.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.86%	53.42%	-9.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.86%	53.42%	-9.56%

CTEX vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEX vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	2.18%	2.17%	0.57%	0.12%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	107.02%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEX and WNTR in my portfolio?

CTEX and WNTR have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTEX or WNTR?

CTEX has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to WNTR (14.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, CTEX or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs 45.57% for CTEX. On fees, CTEX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 14.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CTEX or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs 45.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEX or WNTR?

CTEX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEX or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 2.18% for CTEX.

What is the main difference between CTEX and WNTR?

CTEX is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CTEX and 1.00% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.