CTEX vs. URAN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) and URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while URAN is a Uranium fund tracking the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CTEX returned 116.42% vs 11.93% for URAN. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTEX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for URAN.

Performance

CTEX vs. URAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than URAN's -3.44% return.

CTEX

• 1D: -6.36%
• 1M: -8.02%
• YTD: 20.77%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 116.42%
• 3Y*: 11.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URAN

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: -3.44%
• 6M: -5.94%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEX vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	20.77%	67.74%	-4.76%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	-3.44%	49.05%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEX and URAN is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.52

The correlation between CTEX and URAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CTEX vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEX

CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 13
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEX vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEX	URAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	0.30	+2.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	0.70	+2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.08	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.35	0.39	+4.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.69	0.85	+12.84

CTEX vs. URAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the URAN Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEX and URAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CTEX vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, which is greater than URAN's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and URAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEX	URAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.31%	-31.96%	-38.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.90%	-31.02%	+9.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.23%	-26.70%	+9.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.61%	-11.20%	-30.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.53%	14.06%	-5.53%

Volatility

CTEX vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a higher volatility of 19.24% compared to Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) at 13.40%. This indicates that CTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTEX	URAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.24%	13.40%	+5.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.48%	30.44%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.17%	39.64%	+4.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.59%	39.40%	+4.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.59%	39.40%	+4.19%

CTEX vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEX vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison

CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than URAN's 2.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	1.73%	2.17%	0.57%	0.12%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.65%	2.56%	0.21%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEX and URAN in my portfolio?

CTEX and URAN have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTEX or URAN?

CTEX has higher volatility (19.24%) compared to URAN (13.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs URAN's -31.96%.

Which ETF is better, CTEX or URAN?

On 1-year performance, CTEX leads with 116.42% vs 11.93% for URAN. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, URAN has been the lower-risk option at 13.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CTEX or URAN?

Over the 1-year period, CTEX has performed better with a 116.42% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEX or URAN?

URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CTEX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEX or URAN?

URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.73% for CTEX.

What is the main difference between CTEX and URAN?

CTEX is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while URAN is Uranium. CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while URAN tracks BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CTEX and 0.35% for URAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.