PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEN.DE achieves a -30.10% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 2.80% return.


CTEN.DE

1D
-1.29%
1M
-16.86%
YTD
-30.10%
6M
-33.20%
1Y
-35.44%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
10Y*

4GLD.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
2.80%
6M
6.23%
1Y
31.21%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CTEN.DE
CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP
-30.10%-19.43%96.51%53.65%
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
2.80%49.32%34.57%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEN.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEN.DE
CTEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CTEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTEN.DE4GLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.26

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

1.82

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

4.63

-5.73

CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEN.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEN.DE and 4GLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTEN.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

1.31

-2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.65

-0.30

Drawdowns

CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, which is greater than 4GLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEN.DE and 4GLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEN.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.27%

-36.79%

-19.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.27%

-16.54%

-39.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.27%

-16.54%

-39.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.40%

-14.95%

-40.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-11.83%

-7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.71%

6.52%

+27.19%

Volatility

CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that CTEN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEN.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

5.09%

+4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.00%

20.09%

+14.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.20%

23.06%

+26.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.10%

16.00%

+36.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.10%

14.37%

+37.73%

CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEN.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CTEN.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CTEN.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CTEN.DE and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.00% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTEN.DE and 4GLD.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.00% per year.

CTEN.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Deutsche Börse Commodities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEN.DE and 4GLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer