CTEF vs. EUSA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) and EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. CTEF is actively managed, while EUSA is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTEF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for EUSA.

Performance

CTEF vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 29.80% return, which is significantly higher than EUSA's 10.04% return.

CTEF

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 8.48%
• YTD: 29.80%
• 6M: 30.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EUSA

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 19.17%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEF vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	29.80%	33.22%
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	10.04%	8.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEF and EUSA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

CTEF vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA

EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 50
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 46
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEF vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTEF	EUSA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.56	0.71	+2.85

Drawdowns

CTEF vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum EUSA drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and EUSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEF	EUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.00%	-39.16%	+24.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	0.00%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.79%	-4.59%	+2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTEF	EUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.76%	11.80%	+9.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.76%	16.95%	+4.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.76%	18.34%	+3.42%

CTEF vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEF vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison

CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than EUSA's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	0.06%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	1.51%	1.63%	1.47%	1.53%	1.73%	1.23%	1.45%	1.49%	2.01%	1.50%	1.59%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEF and EUSA in my portfolio?

CTEF and EUSA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CTEF or EUSA?

On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEF or EUSA?

EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEF or EUSA?

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

What is the main difference between CTEF and EUSA?

They also come from different issuers: Castellan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTEF and 0.09% for EUSA.