CTEC vs. XYLD
CTEC (Global X CleanTech ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEC is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CTEC returned -3.60%/yr vs 7.76%/yr for XYLD. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
CTEC vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEC achieves a 42.92% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 5.14% return.
CTEC
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 42.92%
- 6M
- 34.82%
- 1Y
- 130.53%
- 3Y*
- 2.12%
- 5Y*
- -3.60%
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 17.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
CTEC vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF | 42.92% | 57.85% | -36.35% | -25.60% | -16.82% | -22.19% | 47.46% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 5.14% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | 9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEC and XYLD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.48 |
The correlation between CTEC and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
CTEC vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CTEC
XYLD
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
CTEC
XYLD
Energy
CTEC
XYLD
Technology
CTEC
XYLD
Basic Materials
CTEC
XYLD
Consumer Cyclical
CTEC
XYLD
Utilities
CTEC
XYLD
Communication Services
CTEC
-
XYLD
Consumer Defensive
CTEC
-
XYLD
Financial Services
CTEC
-
XYLD
Healthcare
CTEC
-
XYLD
Real Estate
CTEC
-
XYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEC vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
CTEC
XYLD
CTEC vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTEC | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.65 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.45 | 3.39 | +4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.38 | 18.02 | +1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTEC | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76 | 2.74 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.69 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.60 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
CTEC vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEC drawdown since its inception was -81.58%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEC and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEC | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.58% | -33.46% | -48.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -5.29% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.77% | -15.53% | -50.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.46% | -18.66% | -57.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.78% | 0.00% | -45.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.38% | -3.72% | -48.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.76% | 0.99% | +5.77% |
Volatility
CTEC vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.85%. This indicates that CTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEC | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.93% | 0.85% | +10.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.73% | 5.37% | +18.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.93% | 6.54% | +28.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 11.22% | +25.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 14.21% | +23.54% |
CTEC vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEC vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
CTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than XYLD's 10.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 1.56% | 0.51% | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.50% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEC and XYLD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTEC has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to XYLD (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEC dropped -81.58% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 5-year performance, XYLD leads with 7.76% vs -3.60% for CTEC. On fees, CTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 7.76% return vs -3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.50%, compared with 0.52% for CTEC.
CTEC is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. CTEC tracks Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CTEC and 0.60% for XYLD.
CTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTEC and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer