PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTCAX vs. ISGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTCAX vs. ISGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) and Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CTCAX

1D
0.16%
1M
7.90%
YTD
31.05%
6M
29.88%
1Y
57.54%
3Y*
35.16%
5Y*
19.49%
10Y*
25.19%

ISGLX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTCAX vs. ISGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
31.05%24.78%31.39%56.46%-27.45%
ISGLX
Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%20.26%17.89%-19.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CTCAX and ISGLX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022

0.60

The correlation between CTCAX and ISGLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTCAX vs. ISGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTCAX
CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ISGLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTCAX vs. ISGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) and Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTCAXISGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.63

CTCAX vs. ISGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTCAX vs. ISGLX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTCAXISGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

Volatility

CTCAX vs. ISGLX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTCAXISGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

CTCAX vs. ISGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTCAX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ISGLX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTCAX vs. ISGLX - Dividend Comparison

CTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, while ISGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
2.51%3.29%1.08%2.36%3.53%4.15%0.91%2.55%5.82%3.52%0.36%1.80%
ISGLX
Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTCAX and ISGLX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTCAX and ISGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer