ISGLX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
ISGLX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 30, 2008. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
ISGLX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISGLX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISGLX Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.26% | 17.89% | -19.47% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -8.57% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -22.09% |
Returns By Period
ISGLX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCNTX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISGLX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISGLX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ISGLX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
ISGLX
FCNTX
ISGLX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISGLX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.76 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between ISGLX and FCNTX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ISGLX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
ISGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISGLX Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 5.10% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
ISGLX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISGLX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -49.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -11.30% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.18% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility
ISGLX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISGLX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 19.69% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 19.13% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.61% | — |