CTAP vs. ZTWO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and ZTWO (F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify, while ZTWO is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. CTAP is actively managed, while ZTWO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. CTAP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZTWO.

Performance

CTAP vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly higher than ZTWO's 1.36% return.

CTAP

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -2.44%
• 6M: 4.27%
• YTD: 8.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZTWO

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 1.31%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 1Y: 3.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTAP vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	8.12%	2.22%
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	1.36%	0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CTAP and ZTWO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

CTAP vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZTWO

ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTAP vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTAP	ZTWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.87	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.63	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.59	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.18	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	19.64	—

Drawdowns

CTAP vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, which is greater than ZTWO's maximum drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and ZTWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTAP	ZTWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.48%	-0.93%	-19.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.31%	-0.03%	-15.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-0.10%	-4.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTAP	ZTWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.35%	1.36%	+22.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.35%	1.50%	+22.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.35%	1.50%	+22.85%

CTAP vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CTAP vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison

CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than ZTWO's 4.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.07%	4.31%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTAP and ZTWO in my portfolio?

CTAP and ZTWO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CTAP or ZTWO?

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTAP or ZTWO?

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ZTWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTAP or ZTWO?

ZTWO has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 1.84% for CTAP.

What is the main difference between CTAP and ZTWO?

CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ZTWO is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.15% for ZTWO.