PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTAP vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTAP vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 9.49% return.


CTAP

1D
-1.33%
1M
-2.44%
6M
4.27%
YTD
8.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
2.96%
1M
17.94%
6M
21.62%
YTD
9.49%
1Y
127.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTAP vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CTAP and WNTR is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTAP vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTAP vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTAPWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

CTAP vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTAP vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTAPWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.48%

-42.65%

+22.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.31%

-10.67%

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-20.46%

+15.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.63%

Volatility

CTAP vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTAPWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.35%

53.81%

-29.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.35%

53.49%

-29.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.35%

53.49%

-29.14%

CTAP vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTAP vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than WNTR's 106.86% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CTAP and WNTR have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 106.86%, compared with 1.84% for CTAP.

CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 1.01% for WNTR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTAP and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer