CTAP vs. SLDR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and SLDR (Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify, while SLDR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index. CTAP is actively managed, while SLDR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. CTAP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SLDR.

Performance

CTAP vs. SLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 21.95% return, which is significantly higher than SLDR's 0.31% return.

CTAP

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -3.24%
• YTD: 21.95%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLDR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 3.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTAP vs. SLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	21.95%	2.44%
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	0.31%	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CTAP and SLDR is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

CTAP vs. SLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLDR

SLDR Risk / Return Rank: 81
SLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
SLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTAP vs. SLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTAP	SLDR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.50	2.58	-0.08

Drawdowns

CTAP vs. SLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, which is greater than SLDR's maximum drawdown of -0.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and SLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTAP	SLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-0.87%	-8.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.47%	-0.28%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-0.14%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTAP	SLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.94%	1.25%	+22.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.94%	1.24%	+22.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.94%	1.24%	+22.70%

CTAP vs. SLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SLDR's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CTAP vs. SLDR - Dividend Comparison

CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than SLDR's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	3.72%	3.80%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTAP and SLDR in my portfolio?

CTAP and SLDR have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CTAP or SLDR?

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTAP or SLDR?

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SLDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTAP or SLDR?

SLDR has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.65% for CTAP.

What is the main difference between CTAP and SLDR?

CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SLDR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.12% for SLDR.