SLDR vs. DFSD
SLDR (Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) and DFSD (Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — SLDR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index, while DFSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Dimensional. SLDR is passively managed, while DFSD is actively managed. Over the past year, SLDR returned 3.32% vs 5.28% for DFSD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLDR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DFSD.
Performance
SLDR vs. DFSD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLDR achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than DFSD's 0.58% return.
SLDR
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFSD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLDR vs. DFSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 0.28% | 4.60% | 0.61% |
DFSD Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF | 0.58% | 6.59% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLDR and DFSD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SLDR and DFSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLDR vs. DFSD — Risk / Return Rank
SLDR
DFSD
SLDR vs. DFSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) and Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLDR | DFSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.69 | 2.78 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.24 | 4.39 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.57 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 3.87 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.83 | 17.10 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLDR | DFSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.78 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.81 | 0.93 | +1.87 |
Drawdowns
SLDR vs. DFSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLDR drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum DFSD drawdown of -8.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDR and DFSD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLDR | DFSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -8.45% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.87% | -1.47% | +0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.47% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -2.11% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 0.33% | -0.11% |
Volatility
SLDR vs. DFSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) is 0.48%, while Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that SLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLDR | DFSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 0.89% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.64% | 1.34% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25% | 1.92% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.23% | 2.79% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.23% | 2.79% | -1.56% |
SLDR vs. DFSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLDR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSD's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLDR vs. DFSD - Dividend Comparison
SLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than DFSD's 3.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 3.75% | 3.80% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFSD Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF | 3.92% | 4.12% | 4.81% | 3.89% | 2.12% | 0.11% |