CTAP vs. PTIN
CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. CTAP is actively managed, while PTIN is passively managed. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CTAP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PTIN.
Performance
CTAP vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than PTIN's 16.34% return.
CTAP
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PTIN
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 32.43%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.32M | $7.01M | $3.57M | |
| $300.58K | $334.58K | $457.99K |
CTAP vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 8.91% | 2.22% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 16.34% | 1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAP and PTIN is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAP vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PTIN
CTAP vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTAP | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTAP vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, roughly equal to the maximum PTIN drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and PTIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAP | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -21.27% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.68% | -2.02% | -12.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -7.56% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.13% | — |
Volatility
CTAP vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAP | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.78% | 17.72% | +7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 14.74% | +10.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 14.12% | +10.66% |
CTAP vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTAP vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison
CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than PTIN's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.18% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAP and PTIN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.
PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.83% for CTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.66% for PTIN.
Find the right allocation for CTAP and PTIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer