CTAP vs. BILS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and BILS (SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify, while BILS is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. CTAP is actively managed, while BILS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. CTAP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILS.

Performance

CTAP vs. BILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 1.57% return.

CTAP

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: -14.89%
• YTD: 5.23%
• 6M: 3.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BILS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 3.84%
• 3Y*: 4.61%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTAP vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.23%	2.22%
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF	1.57%	0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CTAP and BILS is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

CTAP vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BILS

BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTAP vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTAP	BILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	16.64	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	87.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	34.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	127.82	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1,285.26	—

Drawdowns

CTAP vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -17.57%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and BILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTAP	BILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.57%	-0.41%	-17.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.57%	0.00%	-17.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.10%	-0.04%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTAP	BILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.63%	0.23%	+24.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.63%	0.31%	+24.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.63%	0.30%	+24.33%

CTAP vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CTAP vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison

CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than BILS's 3.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF	3.81%	4.08%	5.01%	4.98%	1.61%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTAP and BILS in my portfolio?

CTAP and BILS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CTAP or BILS?

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTAP or BILS?

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTAP or BILS?

BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.75% for CTAP.

What is the main difference between CTAP and BILS?

CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BILS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.14% for BILS.