BILS vs. CSH2.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L).
BILS and CSH2.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BILS is a passively managed fund by SPDR that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020. CSH2.L is an actively managed fund by Amundi. It was launched on Mar 2, 2015.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BILS or CSH2.L.
Correlation
The correlation between BILS and CSH2.L is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BILS vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BILS:
19.15
CSH2.L:
5.16
BILS:
99.77
CSH2.L:
8.34
BILS:
31.55
CSH2.L:
2.75
BILS:
167.08
CSH2.L:
18.57
BILS:
1,623.25
CSH2.L:
106.53
BILS:
0.00%
CSH2.L:
0.05%
BILS:
0.26%
CSH2.L:
1.03%
BILS:
-0.41%
CSH2.L:
-0.37%
BILS:
0.00%
CSH2.L:
-0.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILS achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than CSH2.L's 1.48% return.
BILS
1.27%
0.37%
2.20%
5.00%
N/A
N/A
CSH2.L
1.48%
0.47%
2.60%
5.42%
2.70%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BILS vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILS has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BILS vs. CSH2.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BILS
CSH2.L
BILS vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BILS vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison
BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 4.75% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% |
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BILS vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILS drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILS and CSH2.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BILS vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) is 0.08%, while Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that BILS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.