CTA vs. TFFI
CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and TFFI (Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTA is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Simplify, while TFFI is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Chesapeake. Both are actively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CTA charges 0.78%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TFFI.
Performance
CTA vs. TFFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CTA
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- 6M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 7.76%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.49%
TFFI
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.61M | $12.21M | $14.75M | |
| $125.11K | $114.17K | $131.97K |
CTA vs. TFFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -6.82% |
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF | 1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTA and TFFI is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTA vs. TFFI — Risk / Return Rank
CTA
TFFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CTA vs. TFFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTA | TFFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.53 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTA vs. TFFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTA drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than TFFI's maximum drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTA and TFFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTA | TFFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.44% | -4.23% | -16.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.54% | -0.64% | -14.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -1.61% | -4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | — | — |
Volatility
CTA vs. TFFI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTA | TFFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 7.78% | +13.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 7.78% | +9.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 7.78% | +9.14% |
CTA vs. TFFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTA has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than TFFI's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTA vs. TFFI - Dividend Comparison
CTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, while TFFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.38% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% |
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTA and TFFI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTA is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTA is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.
CTA has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 0.00% for TFFI.
CTA is categorized as Systematic Trend, while TFFI is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Chesapeake. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for CTA and 1.01% for TFFI.
Find the right allocation for CTA and TFFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer