CTA vs. CVRT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTA is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Simplify, while CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CTA returned 10.03% vs 65.98% for CVRT. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. CTA charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CVRT.

Performance

CTA vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTA achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 33.68% return.

CTA

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -4.51%
• YTD: 9.63%
• 6M: 12.55%
• 1Y: 10.03%
• 3Y*: 10.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CVRT

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 33.68%
• 6M: 32.37%
• 1Y: 65.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTA vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	9.63%	0.88%	24.15%	-7.69%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	33.68%	29.37%	13.23%	11.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CTA and CVRT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023	-0.03

CTA vs. CVRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CTA	CVRT
Basic Materials	-	2.2%
Communication Services	-	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.8%
Energy	-	2.3%
Healthcare	-	7.5%
Industrials	-	9.3%
Real Estate	-	2.6%
Technology	-	42.3%
Utilities	-	13.8%
Financial Services	-49.1%	8.3%

Return for Risk

CTA vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTA

CTA Risk / Return Rank: 19
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 21

CVRT

CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 92
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTA vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTA	CVRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	2.99	-2.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	3.63	-2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.51	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	7.71	-6.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	29.24	-26.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTA vs. CVRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the CVRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTA and CVRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTA	CVRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	2.99	-2.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	1.68	-1.11

Drawdowns

CTA vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTA drawdown since its inception was -18.07%, smaller than the maximum CVRT drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTA and CVRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTA	CVRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.07%	-20.71%	+2.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.00%	-8.60%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.05%	-6.26%	-3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-3.07%	-2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	2.26%	+2.07%

Volatility

CTA vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) is 6.73%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that CTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTA	CVRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.73%	9.06%	-2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.43%	18.46%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.21%	22.22%	-2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	20.20%	-3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	20.20%	-3.61%

CTA vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTA has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CVRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTA vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison

CTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than CVRT's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	4.97%	3.19%	4.80%	7.78%	6.58%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	1.50%	1.68%	1.49%	0.32%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTA and CVRT in my portfolio?

CTA and CVRT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTA or CVRT?

CVRT has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to CTA (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTA dropped -18.07% vs CVRT's -20.71%.

Which ETF is better, CTA or CVRT?

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 65.98% vs 10.03% for CTA. On fees, CVRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CTA has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CTA or CVRT?

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 65.98% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTA or CVRT?

CVRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTA or CVRT?

CTA has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 1.50% for CVRT.

What is the main difference between CTA and CVRT?

CTA is categorized as Systematic Trend, while CVRT is Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for CTA and 0.69% for CVRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.