CSUIX vs. IRFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX).
CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004. IRFIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Mar 30, 2005.
Performance
CSUIX vs. IRFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUIX vs. IRFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | -4.81% | 23.52% | -10.56% | 4.58% | -23.84% | 7.66% | -0.81% | 23.74% | -3.74% | 23.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUIX achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than IRFIX's -4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUIX has outperformed IRFIX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while IRFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
IRFIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -14.45%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUIX vs. IRFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than IRFIX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUIX vs. IRFIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUIX
IRFIX
CSUIX vs. IRFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUIX | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 0.99 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 1.37 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 0.86 | +1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.58 | 3.90 | +6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUIX | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 0.99 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | -0.14 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.16 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.18 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUIX and IRFIX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CSUIX vs. IRFIX - Dividend Comparison
CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than IRFIX's 6.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | 6.48% | 6.17% | 3.24% | 2.62% | 2.62% | 7.70% | 3.40% | 9.81% | 4.19% | 3.37% | 6.46% | 3.36% |
Drawdowns
CSUIX vs. IRFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUIX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, smaller than the maximum IRFIX drawdown of -70.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUIX and IRFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUIX | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.01% | -70.13% | +18.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -14.85% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -38.41% | +18.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | -39.51% | +4.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -20.71% | +16.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -18.69% | +10.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.29% | -1.47% |
Volatility
CSUIX vs. IRFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) is 3.24%, while Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that CSUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUIX | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 5.06% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | 9.13% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 13.55% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 15.12% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 15.59% | -0.71% |