CSUIX vs. FMGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX).
CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004. FMGIX is managed by Frontier Funds. It was launched on Jan 17, 2012.
Performance
CSUIX vs. FMGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUIX vs. FMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund | 6.75% | 22.67% | 34.26% | 4.86% | -9.46% | 13.84% | -1.36% | 28.00% | -6.62% | 20.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUIX achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than FMGIX's 6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUIX has underperformed FMGIX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while FMGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
FMGIX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- 1Y
- 20.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUIX vs. FMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FMGIX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUIX vs. FMGIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUIX
FMGIX
CSUIX vs. FMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUIX | FMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.75 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.26 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.81 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.58 | 10.65 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUIX | FMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.75 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.47 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.19 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.24 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUIX and FMGIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUIX vs. FMGIX - Dividend Comparison
CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, less than FMGIX's 31.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund | 31.50% | 33.65% | 48.77% | 4.79% | 3.98% | 2.63% | 2.38% | 2.63% | 3.09% | 3.15% | 2.83% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
CSUIX vs. FMGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUIX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, smaller than the maximum FMGIX drawdown of -57.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUIX and FMGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUIX | FMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.01% | -57.57% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -7.74% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -26.61% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | -57.57% | +22.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -5.22% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -5.37% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.04% | -0.22% |
Volatility
CSUIX vs. FMGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) is 3.24%, while Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that CSUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUIX | FMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 3.97% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | 6.97% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 11.91% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 28.44% | -15.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 52.56% | -37.68% |