CSUIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
CSUIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSUIX having a 8.44% return and CSUAX slightly lower at 8.35%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSUIX having a 7.83% annualized return and CSUAX not far behind at 7.48%.
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUIX
CSUAX
CSUIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.63 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.17 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.36 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.58 | 10.32 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.63 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.61 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.50 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUIX and CSUAX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
CSUIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUIX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.01% | -52.20% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -7.98% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -20.45% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | -35.05% | +0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -4.38% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -8.49% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.83% | -0.01% |
Volatility
CSUIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 3.26% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | 6.89% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 11.48% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 12.89% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 14.89% | -0.01% |