CSUAX vs. QCSTIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) and QCSTIX (CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3) are both mutual funds - CSUAX is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index, while QCSTIX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by TIAA. CSUAX is passively managed, while QCSTIX is actively managed. Over the past year, CSUAX returned 17.26% vs 24.02% for QCSTIX. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CSUAX vs. QCSTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSUAX having a 12.09% return and QCSTIX slightly lower at 11.57%.

CSUAX

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 8.33%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 1Y: 17.26%
• 3Y*: 11.88%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: 7.22%
• ALL TIME*: 9.25%

QCSTIX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: 7.44%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 1Y: 24.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QCSTIX CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CSUAX vs. QCSTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	12.09%	14.30%	-0.17%
QCSTIX CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3	11.57%	20.05%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUAX and QCSTIX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024	0.35

The correlation between CSUAX and QCSTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSUAX vs. QCSTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 74
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

QCSTIX

QCSTIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
QCSTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QCSTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QCSTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QCSTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QCSTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSUAX vs. QCSTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSUAX	QCSTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.59	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.23	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.29	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	2.28	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.45	9.68	-0.23

CSUAX vs. QCSTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the QCSTIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUAX and QCSTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSUAX vs. QCSTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than QCSTIX's maximum drawdown of -16.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and QCSTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSUAX	QCSTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.20%	-16.98%	-35.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.99%	-9.95%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-1.05%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.39%	-1.98%	-6.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	2.34%	-0.44%

Volatility

CSUAX vs. QCSTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) is 2.93%, while CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that CSUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCSTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSUAX	QCSTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	4.34%	-1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	11.91%	-3.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.13%	14.27%	-4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.00%	15.47%	-2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.88%	15.47%	-0.59%

Dividends

CSUAX vs. QCSTIX - Dividend Comparison

CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, while QCSTIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.63%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%
QCSTIX CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSUAX and QCSTIX in my portfolio?

CSUAX and QCSTIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSUAX or QCSTIX?

QCSTIX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to CSUAX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAX dropped -52.20% vs QCSTIX's -16.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.