QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX) and CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX).

QCSTIX is an actively managed fund by TIAA-CREF. It was launched on May 1, 1992. QCGRIX is an actively managed fund by TIAA-CREF. It was launched on Apr 24, 2015.

Performance

QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX) and CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QCSTIX CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3	-4.78%	20.05%
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3	-12.96%	14.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCSTIX achieves a -4.78% return, which is significantly higher than QCGRIX's -12.96% return.

QCSTIX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -9.29%
• YTD: -4.78%
• 6M: -1.66%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCGRIX

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -8.51%
• YTD: -12.96%
• 6M: -11.72%
• 1Y: 14.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCGRIX

CREF Growth Account Class R3

Return for Risk

QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCSTIX

QCSTIX Risk / Return Rank: 60
QCSTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QCSTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QCSTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QCSTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
QCSTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

QCGRIX

QCGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 25
QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
QCGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
QCGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
QCGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
QCGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX) and CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QCSTIX	QCGRIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	0.71	+0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	1.09	+0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.15	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	0.64	+0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.68	2.13	+3.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCSTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCSTIX and QCGRIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCSTIX	QCGRIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	0.71	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	-0.02	+0.78

Correlation

The correlation between QCSTIX and QCGRIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither QCSTIX nor QCGRIX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCSTIX drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, smaller than the maximum QCGRIX drawdown of -23.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCSTIX and QCGRIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCSTIX	QCGRIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.98%	-23.93%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.78%	-16.69%	+4.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.95%	-16.69%	+6.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-5.24%	+3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	5.02%	-2.26%

Volatility

QCSTIX vs. QCGRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R3 (QCSTIX) is 5.41%, while CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that QCSTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCGRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCSTIX	QCGRIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	5.79%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.77%	12.91%	-3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.19%	20.37%	-5.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.15%	21.20%	-6.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.15%	21.20%	-6.05%