PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSUAX vs. CSZIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSUAX vs. CSZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly lower than CSZIX's 14.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX has outperformed CSZIX with an annualized return of 7.32%, while CSZIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.84% annualized return.


CSUAX

1D
0.50%
1M
1.26%
6M
12.82%
YTD
12.86%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
7.32%

CSZIX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.46%
6M
13.64%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
14.43%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
6.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUAX vs. CSZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
12.86%14.30%8.30%2.09%-5.20%16.24%-1.65%24.26%-5.83%17.99%
CSZIX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z
14.62%4.41%6.81%13.26%-26.21%41.81%-1.64%31.95%-4.17%8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUAX and CSZIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.72

The correlation between CSUAX and CSZIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSUAX vs. CSZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSUAX
CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CSZIX
CSZIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CSZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CSZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUAX vs. CSZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSUAXCSZIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.18

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

1.80

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

5.44

+4.84

CSUAX vs. CSZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the CSZIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUAX and CSZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSUAX vs. CSZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than CSZIX's maximum drawdown of -42.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and CSZIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSUAXCSZIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.20%

-42.71%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-7.96%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-17.17%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.45%

-33.05%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.05%

-42.71%

+7.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-1.55%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-8.70%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.63%

-0.74%

Volatility

CSUAX vs. CSZIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) is 3.46%, while Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that CSUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSUAXCSZIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

4.86%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

11.00%

-2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.09%

14.00%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.00%

18.76%

-5.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

20.85%

-5.98%

CSUAX vs. CSZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CSZIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSUAX vs. CSZIX - Dividend Comparison

CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, more than CSZIX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
7.58%8.09%2.23%2.17%3.55%2.95%1.30%1.52%2.08%5.00%2.04%6.20%
CSZIX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z
3.30%3.81%2.85%3.00%7.77%4.38%5.47%7.70%3.68%2.60%5.90%22.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSUAX and CSZIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSZIX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to CSUAX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAX dropped -52.20% vs CSZIX's -42.71%.

CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSUAX and CSZIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer