CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSTA.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist) and 10AJ.DE (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - CSTA.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology, while 10AJ.DE is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSTA.DE returned 8.98%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for 10AJ.DE. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSTA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for 10AJ.DE.

Performance

CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSTA.DE achieves a 26.81% return, which is significantly higher than 10AJ.DE's 7.96% return.

CSTA.DE

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 15.91%
• YTD: 26.81%
• 6M: 24.52%
• 1Y: 25.25%
• 3Y*: 14.19%
• 5Y*: 8.98%
• 10Y*: 13.18%

10AJ.DE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 7.45%
• 1Y: 9.52%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist	26.81%	3.46%	6.60%	32.50%	-27.79%	34.31%	14.21%	37.95%	-12.67%
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	7.96%	-1.85%	5.52%	6.85%	-20.55%	36.79%	-16.96%	23.88%	1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CSTA.DE and 10AJ.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.40

Return for Risk

CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSTA.DE

CSTA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 31
CSTA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CSTA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
CSTA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CSTA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CSTA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 30

10AJ.DE

10AJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 25
10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
10AJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
10AJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
10AJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
10AJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSTA.DE	10AJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	0.85	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	1.23	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.15	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.20	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.37	3.94	+0.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSTA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the 10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSTA.DE and 10AJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSTA.DE	10AJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	0.85	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.13	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.22	+0.31

Drawdowns

CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSTA.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.24%, smaller than the maximum 10AJ.DE drawdown of -42.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTA.DE and 10AJ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSTA.DE	10AJ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.24%	-42.62%	+2.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.91%	-7.89%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.86%	-20.52%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.24%	-30.01%	-10.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.63%	+6.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-12.13%	+3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	2.41%	+3.36%

Volatility

CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) at 2.70%. This indicates that CSTA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 10AJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSTA.DE	10AJ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	2.70%	+5.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.06%	8.38%	+10.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.18%	11.14%	+12.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.97%	14.60%	+10.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	17.10%	+6.23%

CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSTA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 10AJ.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSTA.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSTA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 10AJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	2.77%	2.99%	2.94%	2.98%	3.23%	2.13%	3.10%	2.92%	2.63%	0.00%
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.59%	1.04%	0.52%	0.55%	1.26%	1.49%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSTA.DE and 10AJ.DE in my portfolio?

CSTA.DE and 10AJ.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSTA.DE or 10AJ.DE?

On fees, 10AJ.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSTA.DE or 10AJ.DE?

10AJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSTA.DE.

What is the main difference between CSTA.DE and 10AJ.DE?

CSTA.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while 10AJ.DE is REIT. CSTA.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Technology, while 10AJ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CSTA.DE and 0.24% for 10AJ.DE.