CSTA.DE vs. M37R.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) and HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE).
CSTA.DE and M37R.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSTA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology. It was launched on Sep 3, 2020. M37R.DE is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse. It was launched on Mar 15, 2022. Both CSTA.DE and M37R.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CSTA.DE vs. M37R.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSTA.DE vs. M37R.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | -2.16% | 3.46% | -2.45% |
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | -20.04% | -10.17% | 28.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSTA.DE achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly higher than M37R.DE's -20.04% return.
CSTA.DE
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.74%
- 1Y
- 2.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
M37R.DE
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- YTD
- -20.04%
- 6M
- -31.63%
- 1Y
- -8.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSTA.DE vs. M37R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSTA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than M37R.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSTA.DE vs. M37R.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSTA.DE
M37R.DE
CSTA.DE vs. M37R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) and HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSTA.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | -0.26 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.31 | -0.15 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.98 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | -0.24 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | -0.62 | +1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSTA.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | -0.26 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | -0.16 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSTA.DE and M37R.DE is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CSTA.DE vs. M37R.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSTA.DE nor M37R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.59% | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.55% | 1.26% | 1.49% | 0.09% |
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CSTA.DE vs. M37R.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSTA.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.24%, roughly equal to the maximum M37R.DE drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTA.DE and M37R.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSTA.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.24% | -38.85% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -38.85% | +23.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.99% | -35.62% | +24.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -12.70% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.58% | 15.05% | -9.47% |
Volatility
CSTA.DE vs. M37R.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) is 8.25%, while HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that CSTA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than M37R.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSTA.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 10.31% | -2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.85% | 21.55% | -4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.77% | 32.81% | -9.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 32.11% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 32.11% | -8.99% |