PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSPX.L vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSPX.L vs. VEA

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L returned 15.44%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for VEA. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSPX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.

Performance

CSPX.L vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPX.L achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 16.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 15.44%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.

CSPX.L

1D
1.66%
1M
1.84%
YTD
10.20%
6M
11.35%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
15.44%

VEA

1D
1.17%
1M
4.79%
YTD
16.08%
6M
17.35%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPX.L vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		10.20%17.45%25.25%26.74%-18.72%29.35%17.62%30.55%-5.46%21.60%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF		16.08%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPX.L and VEA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.50

The correlation between CSPX.L and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSPX.L vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSPX.L
VEA

Technology

37.5%
13.8%

Financial Services

11.7%
23.3%

Communication Services

10.4%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
7.5%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.2%

Industrials

8.0%
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.6%

Energy

3.4%
5.4%

Utilities

2.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
7.5%

Technology

CSPX.L
37.5%
VEA
13.8%

Financial Services

CSPX.L
11.7%
VEA
23.3%

Communication Services

CSPX.L
10.4%
VEA
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CSPX.L
9.5%
VEA
7.5%

Healthcare

CSPX.L
8.9%
VEA
8.2%

Industrials

CSPX.L
8.0%
VEA
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

CSPX.L
4.8%
VEA
5.6%

Energy

CSPX.L
3.4%
VEA
5.4%

Utilities

CSPX.L
2.2%
VEA
3.3%

Real Estate

CSPX.L
1.9%
VEA
2.7%

Basic Materials

CSPX.L
1.7%
VEA
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF

Often compared with CSPX.L:
CSPX.L vs. VOOCSPX.L vs. VUAA.LCSPX.L vs. SPYCSPX.L vs. CSPX.ASCSPX.L vs. CSP1.LCSPX.L vs. VWRL.ASCSPX.L vs. IVV
Often compared with VEA:
VEA vs. VXUSVEA vs. VWOVEA vs. VOOVEA vs. VEUVEA vs. SCHFVEA vs. IEFAVEA vs. VTI

Return for Risk

CSPX.L vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSPX.L
CSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPX.L vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CSPX.LVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.21
2.00

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.26
2.74

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.85

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

10.96

+2.72

CSPX.L vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPX.L and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSPX.L vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.L and VEA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSPX.LVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-60.68%

+26.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-11.63%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-13.45%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-29.71%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-35.73%

+1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-13.27%

+9.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.01%

-1.05%

Volatility

CSPX.L vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) is 4.15%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that CSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSPX.LVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

6.92%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

14.42%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

16.58%

-4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

16.73%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.41%

-1.18%

CSPX.L vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSPX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSPX.L vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF		2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

CSPX.L and VEA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for CSPX.L.

CSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.L and 0.03% for VEA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSPX.L and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer