CSNDX.MI vs. XDWT.L
CSNDX.MI (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDWT.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNDX.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XDWT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSNDX.MI returned 21.25%/yr vs 24.01%/yr for XDWT.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSNDX.MI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWT.L.
Performance
CSNDX.MI vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSNDX.MI is traded in EUR, while XDWT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWT.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNDX.MI achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.L's 25.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CSNDX.MI has underperformed XDWT.L with an annualized return of 21.25%, while XDWT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.01% annualized return.
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
XDWT.L
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 25.51%
- 6M
- 23.93%
- 1Y
- 48.86%
- 3Y*
- 29.31%
- 5Y*
- 22.50%
- 10Y*
- 24.01%
CSNDX.MI vs. XDWT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 20.42% | 6.74% | 35.09% | 50.07% | -30.24% | 39.83% | 35.45% | 41.91% | 3.62% | 16.34% |
XDWT.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 25.51% | 7.89% | 42.74% | 50.18% | -27.13% | 39.57% | 32.55% | 49.58% | 1.40% | 20.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and XDWT.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and XDWT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSNDX.MI vs. XDWT.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSNDX.MI
XDWT.L
CSNDX.MI vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSNDX.MI | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.05 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 8.02 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSNDX.MI | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.34 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.97 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | 1.10 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.09 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
CSNDX.MI vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWT.L drawdown of -31.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNDX.MI and XDWT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSNDX.MI | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -31.39% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -15.92% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.71% | -29.64% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.19% | -29.64% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.19% | -31.39% | +0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -2.53% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -5.94% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 6.07% | -2.70% |
Volatility
CSNDX.MI vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) is 4.28%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that CSNDX.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSNDX.MI | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 7.26% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 15.56% | -4.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 20.76% | -5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 23.24% | -3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 22.21% | -2.60% |
CSNDX.MI vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNDX.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWT.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSNDX.MI vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSNDX.MI nor XDWT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, CSNDX.MI and XDWT.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XDWT.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWT.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
CSNDX.MI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XDWT.L is Technology Equities. CSNDX.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CSNDX.MI and 0.25% for XDWT.L.
Find the right allocation for CSNDX.MI and XDWT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer