XDWT.L vs. WITS.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS).
XDWT.L and WITS.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWT.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 9, 2016. WITS.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 16, 2019. Both XDWT.L and WITS.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWT.L or WITS.AS.
Key characteristics
| XDWT.L | WITS.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 27.66% | 25.05% |
| 1Y Return | 46.24% | 44.03% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 14.00% | 13.23% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.29 | 2.41 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.94 | 3.09 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.41 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.07 | 3.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.86 | 10.36 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.39% | 4.81% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.77% | 20.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.99% | -39.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.51% | -3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWT.L and WITS.AS is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XDWT.L vs. WITS.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDWT.L achieves a 27.66% return, which is significantly higher than WITS.AS's 25.05% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWT.L vs. WITS.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWT.L and WITS.AS have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWT.L vs. WITS.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWT.L vs. WITS.AS - Dividend Comparison
XDWT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WITS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWT.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WITS.AS iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.73% | 0.12% |
Drawdowns
XDWT.L vs. WITS.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, smaller than the maximum WITS.AS drawdown of -39.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.L and WITS.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWT.L vs. WITS.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) is 4.89%, while iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that XDWT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WITS.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.