CSNDX.MI vs. XBLC.L
CSNDX.MI (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XBLC.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNDX.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XBLC.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSNDX.MI returned 18.66%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XBLC.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSNDX.MI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XBLC.L.
Performance
CSNDX.MI vs. XBLC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNDX.MI achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than XBLC.L's 1.01% return.
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 22.03%
- 1Y
- 39.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
XBLC.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
CSNDX.MI vs. XBLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 20.42% | 6.74% | 35.09% | 50.07% | -30.24% | 39.83% | 35.45% | 41.91% | 3.62% | 7.73% |
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 1.01% | 2.95% | 4.36% | 7.50% | -13.29% | -1.05% | 2.52% | 6.28% | -1.53% | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and XBLC.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSNDX.MI vs. XBLC.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSNDX.MI
XBLC.L
CSNDX.MI vs. XBLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSNDX.MI | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.16 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 0.92 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 3.15 | +8.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSNDX.MI vs. XBLC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, which is greater than XBLC.L's maximum drawdown of -17.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNDX.MI and XBLC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSNDX.MI | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -17.18% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -2.67% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.71% | -2.67% | -24.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.19% | -17.18% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.60% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -4.49% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 0.78% | +2.59% |
Volatility
CSNDX.MI vs. XBLC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) at 1.08%. This indicates that CSNDX.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBLC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSNDX.MI | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 1.08% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 2.66% | +8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 3.01% | +12.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 4.39% | +15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 4.70% | +14.91% |
CSNDX.MI vs. XBLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNDX.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XBLC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSNDX.MI vs. XBLC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSNDX.MI nor XBLC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSNDX.MI and XBLC.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBLC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBLC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
CSNDX.MI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XBLC.L is European Corporate Bonds. CSNDX.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CSNDX.MI and 0.12% for XBLC.L.
Find the right allocation for CSNDX.MI and XBLC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer