CSNDX.MI vs. KWEB.L
CSNDX.MI (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and KWEB.L (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNDX.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while KWEB.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSNDX.MI returned 18.66%/yr vs -13.17%/yr for KWEB.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSNDX.MI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KWEB.L.
Performance
CSNDX.MI vs. KWEB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSNDX.MI is traded in EUR, while KWEB.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KWEB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNDX.MI achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB.L's -19.52% return.
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
KWEB.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -19.52%
- 6M
- -21.93%
- 1Y
- -16.01%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- -13.17%
- 10Y*
- —
CSNDX.MI vs. KWEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 20.42% | 6.74% | 35.09% | 50.07% | -30.24% | 39.83% | 35.45% | 41.91% | -4.39% |
KWEB.L KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -19.52% | 10.46% | 20.95% | -12.56% | -12.92% | -45.84% | 48.30% | 28.35% | -3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and KWEB.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2018 | 0.42 |
The correlation between CSNDX.MI and KWEB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSNDX.MI vs. KWEB.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSNDX.MI
KWEB.L
CSNDX.MI vs. KWEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSNDX.MI | KWEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.92 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | -0.47 | +4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | -0.96 | +12.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSNDX.MI | KWEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | -0.60 | +3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | -0.29 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | -0.07 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
CSNDX.MI vs. KWEB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum KWEB.L drawdown of -76.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNDX.MI and KWEB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSNDX.MI | KWEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.19% | -76.95% | +45.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -34.09% | +24.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.71% | -34.09% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.19% | -66.53% | +35.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -66.98% | +66.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -44.23% | +38.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 16.65% | -13.28% |
Volatility
CSNDX.MI vs. KWEB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) is 4.28%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB.L) has a volatility of 11.31%. This indicates that CSNDX.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSNDX.MI | KWEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 11.31% | -7.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 19.86% | -9.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 26.62% | -11.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 44.85% | -25.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 41.26% | -21.65% |
CSNDX.MI vs. KWEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNDX.MI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSNDX.MI vs. KWEB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSNDX.MI nor KWEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSNDX.MI and KWEB.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSNDX.MI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSNDX.MI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KWEB.L.
CSNDX.MI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while KWEB.L is Technology Equities. CSNDX.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while KWEB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Waystone Management. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CSNDX.MI and 0.75% for KWEB.L.
Find the right allocation for CSNDX.MI and KWEB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer