KWEB.L vs. VWRA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L).
KWEB.L and VWRA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KWEB.L is a passively managed fund by Waystone Management that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 20, 2018. VWRA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. Both KWEB.L and VWRA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KWEB.L or VWRA.L.
Key characteristics
| KWEB.L | VWRA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.37% | 18.12% |
| 1Y Return | 21.74% | 31.78% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.30% | 7.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -3.71% | 12.03% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.61 | 2.63 |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.96% | 11.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.20% | -33.62% |
| Current Drawdown | -66.02% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWEB.L and VWRA.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KWEB.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KWEB.L achieves a 21.37% return, which is significantly higher than VWRA.L's 18.12% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KWEB.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWEB.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KWEB.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KWEB.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KWEB.L nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
KWEB.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWEB.L drawdown since its inception was -81.20%, which is greater than VWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB.L and VWRA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KWEB.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB.L) has a higher volatility of 12.73% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) at 3.98%. This indicates that KWEB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.