CSMD vs. FRTY
CSMD (Congress SMID Growth ETF) and FRTY (Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSMD returned 14.97% vs 30.04% for FRTY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSMD charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FRTY.
Performance
CSMD vs. FRTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSMD achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than FRTY's 12.43% return.
CSMD
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRTY
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 10.48%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CSMD vs. FRTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF | 10.72% | 5.68% | 12.70% | 6.44% |
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF | 12.43% | 12.82% | 38.86% | 9.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSMD and FRTY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between CSMD and FRTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSMD vs. FRTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSMD
FRTY
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
CSMD
FRTY
Technology
CSMD
FRTY
Healthcare
CSMD
FRTY
Consumer Cyclical
CSMD
FRTY
Consumer Defensive
CSMD
FRTY
Financial Services
CSMD
FRTY
Energy
CSMD
FRTY
Basic Materials
CSMD
FRTY
-
Real Estate
CSMD
FRTY
-
Communication Services
CSMD
-
FRTY
Utilities
CSMD
-
FRTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSMD vs. FRTY — Risk / Return Rank
CSMD
FRTY
CSMD vs. FRTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSMD | FRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 1.53 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | 3.97 | -0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSMD | FRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.17 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.14 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
CSMD vs. FRTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSMD drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum FRTY drawdown of -53.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMD and FRTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSMD | FRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.54% | -53.15% | +30.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -19.75% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.76% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -27.97% | +23.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 7.59% | -2.74% |
Volatility
CSMD vs. FRTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) is 6.03%, while Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that CSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSMD | FRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 9.01% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | 18.38% | -3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 25.86% | -6.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 27.19% | -7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 27.11% | -7.34% |
CSMD vs. FRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSMD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FRTY's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSMD vs. FRTY - Dividend Comparison
CSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSMD and FRTY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRTY has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to CSMD (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMD dropped -22.54% vs FRTY's -53.15%.
On 1-year performance, FRTY leads with 30.04% vs 14.97% for CSMD. On fees, FRTY is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CSMD has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FRTY has performed better with a 30.04% return vs 14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FRTY is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CSMD.
FRTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for CSMD.
They also come from different issuers: Congress and Alger Group Holdings LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CSMD and 0.60% for FRTY.
FRTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSMD and FRTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer