CSM vs. WTIP
CSM (Proshares Large Cap Core Plus) and WTIP (WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund) are both Long-Short funds. CSM is passively managed, while WTIP is actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for WTIP.
Performance
CSM vs. WTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSM achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than WTIP's 15.11% return.
CSM
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 30.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
WTIP
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 17.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSM vs. WTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 9.53% | 18.08% |
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund | 15.11% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSM and WTIP is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSM vs. WTIP — Risk / Return Rank
CSM
WTIP
CSM vs. WTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSM | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSM | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.95 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
CSM vs. WTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSM drawdown since its inception was -36.11%, which is greater than WTIP's maximum drawdown of -7.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSM and WTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSM | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.11% | -7.74% | -28.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -7.73% | +7.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -1.36% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | — | — |
Volatility
CSM vs. WTIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSM | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 17.07% | -5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 17.07% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 17.07% | +1.31% |
CSM vs. WTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSM vs. WTIP - Dividend Comparison
CSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than WTIP's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 1.00% | 1.04% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 0.78% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.49% | 1.67% |
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund | 2.78% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSM and WTIP have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTIP.
WTIP has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.00% for CSM.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CSM and 0.65% for WTIP.
Find the right allocation for CSM and WTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer