CSM vs. QAI
Compare and contrast key facts about Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI).
CSM and QAI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2009. QAI is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. Both CSM and QAI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CSM vs. QAI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSM vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | -5.83% | 21.84% | 22.09% | 23.50% | -18.27% | 33.13% | 10.94% | 29.26% | -7.88% | 22.52% |
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.82% | 8.29% | 6.67% | 10.07% | -8.68% | -0.16% | 5.73% | 8.68% | -3.32% | 6.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSM achieves a -5.83% return, which is significantly lower than QAI's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, CSM has outperformed QAI with an annualized return of 12.84%, while QAI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.30% annualized return.
CSM
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- 18.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
QAI
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSM vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSM vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank
CSM
QAI
CSM vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSM | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.41 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.99 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.93 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 8.93 | -2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSM | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.41 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.53 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.54 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.51 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSM and QAI is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSM vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison
CSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than QAI's 1.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 1.16% | 1.04% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 0.78% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.49% | 1.67% |
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.48% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
CSM vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSM drawdown since its inception was -36.11%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSM and QAI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSM | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.11% | -14.95% | -21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -5.43% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.82% | -14.32% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.11% | -14.95% | -21.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.17% | -2.51% | -4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -2.60% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 1.17% | +1.65% |
Volatility
CSM vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) at 2.83%. This indicates that CSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSM | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 2.83% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 4.95% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 7.55% | +11.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 6.51% | +10.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 6.12% | +12.25% |