CSIO vs. FWD
CSIO (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
CSIO vs. FWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIO achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 38.47% return.
CSIO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWD
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 10.81%
- YTD
- 38.47%
- 6M
- 37.27%
- 1Y
- 72.96%
- 3Y*
- 38.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSIO vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 13.87% | -0.11% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 38.47% | -2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIO and FWD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIO vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank
CSIO
FWD
CSIO vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSIO | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.73 | 1.65 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
CSIO vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIO drawdown since its inception was -5.86%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIO and FWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIO | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -29.02% | +23.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -1.44% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -4.06% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.66% | — |
Volatility
CSIO vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIO | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.54% | 24.18% | -12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.54% | 24.72% | -13.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.54% | 24.72% | -13.18% |
CSIO vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CSIO and FWD have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
CSIO vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison
CSIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 0.08% | 0.11% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIO and FWD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSIO and FWD have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
CSIO has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.
They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and AllianceBernstein.
Find the right allocation for CSIO and FWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer