CSIO vs. DRIV
CSIO (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CSIO is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSIO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
CSIO vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIO achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 28.07% return.
CSIO
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- 28.07%
- 6M
- 25.63%
- 1Y
- 66.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- —
CSIO vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 15.68% | 0.82% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 28.07% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIO and DRIV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIO vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
CSIO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DRIV
CSIO vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSIO | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIO vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIO drawdown since its inception was -5.86%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIO and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIO | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -41.93% | +36.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -10.92% | +10.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -15.07% | +13.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.27% | — |
Volatility
CSIO vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIO | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 27.65% | -16.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 27.57% | -16.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 27.63% | -16.24% |
CSIO vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIO vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
CSIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than DRIV's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.83% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIO and DRIV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSIO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSIO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.
DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.65% for CSIO.
They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSIO and 0.68% for DRIV.
Find the right allocation for CSIO and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer