CSIEX vs. RYGRX
CSIEX (Calvert Equity Fund) and RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CSIEX returned 11.61%/yr vs 14.07%/yr for RYGRX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSIEX charges 0.91%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYGRX.
Performance
CSIEX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIEX achieves a -12.17% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 35.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CSIEX has underperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 11.61%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.
CSIEX
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -12.17%
- 6M
- -12.57%
- 1Y
- -8.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
RYGRX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 35.24%
- 6M
- 32.32%
- 1Y
- 42.19%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.07%
CSIEX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIEX Calvert Equity Fund | -12.17% | 7.27% | 8.35% | 17.93% | -17.61% | 28.90% | 24.26% | 36.46% | 5.03% | 25.78% |
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund | 35.24% | 11.00% | 25.73% | 5.80% | -28.71% | 26.61% | 26.34% | 34.13% | -6.28% | 23.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIEX and RYGRX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSIEX and RYGRX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIEX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank
CSIEX
RYGRX
CSIEX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSIEX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.36 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 3.96 | -4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 14.75 | -15.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIEX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIEX drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, smaller than the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIEX and RYGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIEX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.81% | -54.22% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.28% | -11.17% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.87% | -24.95% | +10.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.71% | -36.57% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.50% | -36.63% | +6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.28% | 0.00% | -14.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -9.39% | +3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 2.99% | +3.51% |
Volatility
CSIEX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) is 4.54%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that CSIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIEX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 9.88% | -5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 18.39% | -8.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 21.58% | -8.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 23.83% | -7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 23.05% | -5.86% |
CSIEX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIEX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIEX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison
CSIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.15%, more than RYGRX's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIEX Calvert Equity Fund | 26.15% | 22.97% | 8.74% | 1.79% | 3.40% | 3.56% | 2.70% | 2.87% | 8.78% | 8.10% | 11.30% | 25.62% |
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund | 3.76% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.81% | 4.43% | 12.10% | 7.15% | 6.26% | 0.05% | 2.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIEX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYGRX has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to CSIEX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIEX dropped -50.81% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.
RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSIEX and RYGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer