PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSIEX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSIEX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSIEX achieves a -7.75% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 11.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CSIEX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 11.72%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


CSIEX

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
-7.75%
6M
-6.81%
1Y
-4.36%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
11.72%

SWPPX

1D
0.26%
1M
5.22%
YTD
11.52%
6M
11.92%
1Y
29.52%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSIEX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSIEX
Calvert Equity Fund
-7.75%7.27%8.35%17.93%-17.61%28.90%24.26%36.46%5.03%25.78%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.52%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CSIEX and SWPPX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 1997

0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between CSIEX and SWPPX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSIEX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSIEX
CSIEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CSIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSIEX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSIEXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.36

2.54

-2.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.43

3.44

-3.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.46

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

3.38

-3.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.71

15.82

-16.53

CSIEX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSIEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSIEX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSIEXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

2.54

-2.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.84

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.86

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.51

-0.04

Drawdowns

CSIEX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSIEX drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIEX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSIEXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.81%

-55.06%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.12%

-8.89%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.87%

-18.74%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.71%

-24.51%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.50%

-33.80%

+3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.96%

0.00%

-9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-9.95%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

1.90%

+3.99%

Volatility

CSIEX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 2.83%. This indicates that CSIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSIEXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

2.83%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

8.99%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

11.90%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.93%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

18.23%

-1.08%

CSIEX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSIEX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSIEX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

CSIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.90%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSIEX
Calvert Equity Fund
24.90%22.97%8.74%1.79%3.40%3.56%2.70%2.87%8.78%8.10%11.30%25.62%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSIEX and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSIEX has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to SWPPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIEX dropped -50.81% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSIEX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer