CSHP vs. UXRP
CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) and UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares, while UXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg XRP Index. CSHP is actively managed, while UXRP is passively managed. Over the past year, CSHP returned 3.90% vs -94.43% for UXRP. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. CSHP charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for UXRP.
Performance
CSHP vs. UXRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHP achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than UXRP's -75.31% return.
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXRP
- 1D
- 9.40%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- 6M
- -81.26%
- YTD
- -75.31%
- 1Y
- -94.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP vs. UXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 2.04% | 1.82% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | -75.31% | -77.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHP and UXRP is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSHP vs. UXRP — Risk / Return Rank
CSHP
UXRP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSHP vs. UXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSHP | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 167.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSHP vs. UXRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHP drawdown since its inception was -0.23%, smaller than the maximum UXRP drawdown of -96.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHP and UXRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHP | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -96.60% | +96.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.23% | -96.60% | +96.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -96.08% | +96.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -73.87% | +73.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | — | — |
Volatility
CSHP vs. UXRP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSHP | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55% | 146.45% | -145.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 146.45% | -145.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 146.45% | -145.94% |
CSHP vs. UXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UXRP's 1.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSHP vs. UXRP - Dividend Comparison
CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than UXRP's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 4.01% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSHP and UXRP have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.90% vs -94.43% for UXRP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.90% return vs -94.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.
CSHP is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while UXRP is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSHP and 1.67% for UXRP.
Find the right allocation for CSHP and UXRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer