CSHP vs. UXRP
CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) and UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares, while UXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg XRP Index. CSHP is actively managed, while UXRP is passively managed. Over the past year, CSHP returned 4.19% vs -94.48% for UXRP. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CSHP charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for UXRP.
Performance
CSHP vs. UXRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHP achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than UXRP's -77.13% return.
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.37%
UXRP
- 1D
- 3.92%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -68.49%
- YTD
- -77.13%
- 1Y
- -94.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -94.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.42M | $7.30M | $2.63M | |
| $787.79K | $722.15K | $1.31M |
CSHP vs. UXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 2.53% | 1.82% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | -77.13% | -77.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHP and UXRP is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSHP vs. UXRP — Risk / Return Rank
CSHP
UXRP
CSHP vs. UXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSHP | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +8.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.79 | 0.80 | +1.99 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.90 | -0.99 | +11.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 68.37 | -1.23 | +69.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSHP vs. UXRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHP drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, smaller than the maximum UXRP drawdown of -96.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHP and UXRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHP | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -96.60% | +96.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.39% | -95.74% | +95.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -96.37% | +96.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -75.05% | +75.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 77.03% | -76.97% |
Volatility
CSHP vs. UXRP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) is 1.11%, while ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) has a volatility of 24.55%. This indicates that CSHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSHP | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 24.55% | -23.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.12% | 101.20% | -100.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15% | 143.32% | -142.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.86% | 143.31% | -142.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.86% | 143.31% | -142.45% |
CSHP vs. UXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UXRP's 1.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSHP vs. UXRP - Dividend Comparison
CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than UXRP's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 4.10% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSHP and UXRP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXRP has higher volatility (24.55%) compared to CSHP (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHP dropped -0.39% vs UXRP's -96.60%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 4.19% vs -94.48% for UXRP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 4.19% return vs -94.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.
CSHP is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while UXRP is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSHP and 1.67% for UXRP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSHP and UXRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer