PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSHP vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSHP vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHP achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.


CSHP

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.93%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHP vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
1.63%4.10%2.24%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CSHP and DGRO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024

0.05

The correlation between CSHP and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSHP vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSHP
DGRO

Financial Services

0.1%
21.2%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

11.5%

Energy

-

5.6%

Healthcare

-

16.4%

Industrials

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

19.4%

Utilities

-

6.9%

Financial Services

CSHP
0.1%
DGRO
21.2%

Basic Materials

CSHP

-

DGRO
2.5%

Communication Services

CSHP

-

DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CSHP

-

DGRO
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

CSHP

-

DGRO
11.5%

Energy

CSHP

-

DGRO
5.6%

Healthcare

CSHP

-

DGRO
16.4%

Industrials

CSHP

-

DGRO
10.8%

Real Estate

CSHP

-

DGRO

-

Technology

CSHP

-

DGRO
19.4%

Utilities

CSHP

-

DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSHP vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHP
CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHP vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSHPDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+27.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

7.44

1.43

+6.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

65.71

3.50

+62.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

432.16

13.52

+418.64

CSHP vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHP Sharpe Ratio is 11.91, which is higher than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHP and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSHPDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91

2.39

+9.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.75

0.76

+9.99

Drawdowns

CSHP vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHP drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHP and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSHPDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-35.10%

+35.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

-6.47%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-3.44%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

1.67%

-1.66%

Volatility

CSHP vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) is 0.07%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that CSHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSHPDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

2.21%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.24%

6.91%

-6.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33%

9.48%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.40%

13.82%

-13.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.40%

16.62%

-16.22%

CSHP vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSHP vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
3.92%5.39%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSHP and DGRO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHP dropped -0.08% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 1-year performance, DGRO leads with 22.54% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 22.54% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

CSHP is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSHP and 0.08% for DGRO.

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSHP and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer