CSHI vs. SPTU
CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds - CSHI tracks the NONE while SPTU tracks the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. CSHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
CSHI vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than SPTU's 1.48% return.
CSHI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHI vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 2.26% | 1.14% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHI and SPTU is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSHI vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
CSHI
SPTU
CSHI vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSHI | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 29.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 154.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSHI | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.18 | 11.82 | -7.64 |
Drawdowns
CSHI vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHI | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -0.04% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.00% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | — | — |
Volatility
CSHI vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSHI | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86% | 0.32% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 0.32% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 0.32% | +1.00% |
CSHI vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSHI vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 4.90% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSHI and SPTU have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.
CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
CSHI tracks NONE, while SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Neos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CSHI and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for CSHI and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer