CSHI vs. MMKT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) and MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the NONE, while MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital. CSHI is passively managed, while MMKT is actively managed. Over the past year, CSHI returned 5.25% vs 3.81% for MMKT. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MMKT.

Performance

CSHI vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.44% return.

CSHI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMKT

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHI vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	2.26%	5.05%	1.43%
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	1.44%	4.13%	1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CSHI and MMKT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024	0.00

Return for Risk

CSHI vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

MMKT

MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHI vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSHI	MMKT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.16	16.49	-10.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.83	62.61	-50.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.75	15.14	-12.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.16	153.44	-124.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	154.18	910.67	-756.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSHI vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHI Sharpe Ratio is 6.16, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 16.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHI and MMKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSHI	MMKT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.16	16.49	-10.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.18	17.60	-13.42

Drawdowns

CSHI vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and MMKT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSHI	MMKT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-0.04%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.18%	-0.02%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.00%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.00%	+0.03%

Volatility

CSHI vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) has a higher volatility of 0.11% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that CSHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSHI	MMKT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	0.05%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.52%	0.13%	+0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86%	0.23%	+0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.32%	0.23%	+1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.32%	0.23%	+1.09%

CSHI vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSHI vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than MMKT's 3.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.90%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	3.73%	3.98%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSHI and MMKT in my portfolio?

CSHI and MMKT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSHI or MMKT?

CSHI has higher volatility (0.11%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHI dropped -1.69% vs MMKT's -0.04%.

Which ETF is better, CSHI or MMKT?

On 1-year performance, CSHI leads with 5.25% vs 3.81% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSHI or MMKT?

Over the 1-year period, CSHI has performed better with a 5.25% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSHI or MMKT?

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSHI or MMKT?

CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 3.73% for MMKT.

What is the main difference between CSHI and MMKT?

CSHI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CSHI and 0.20% for MMKT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.49 vs 6.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.