CSHI vs. BILS
Compare and contrast key facts about Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS).
CSHI and BILS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022. BILS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020. Both CSHI and BILS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CSHI vs. BILS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSHI vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 1.30% | 5.05% | 5.66% | 6.21% | 1.46% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.80% | 4.23% | 5.17% | 4.92% | 0.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 0.80% return.
CSHI
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSHI vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSHI vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank
CSHI
BILS
CSHI vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSHI | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 16.39 | -13.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.01 | 75.13 | -71.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.01 | 26.69 | -24.68 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 132.67 | -129.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.78 | 1,118.82 | -1,090.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSHI | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 16.39 | -13.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 10.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.10 | 9.65 | -5.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHI and BILS is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CSHI vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison
CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than BILS's 3.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 4.98% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.60% | 4.08% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
CSHI vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and BILS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHI | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -0.41% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.69% | -0.03% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.04% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 0.00% | +0.19% |
Volatility
CSHI vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison
Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) at 0.05%. This indicates that CSHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSHI | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 0.05% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.68% | 0.15% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01% | 0.24% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 0.31% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 0.30% | +1.05% |