PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSH2.L vs. TRIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSH2.L vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSH2.L is traded in GBp, while TRIN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TRIN values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH2.L achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly lower than TRIN's 39.45% return.


CSH2.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.32%
YTD
2.01%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
2.10%

TRIN

1D
3.72%
1M
14.64%
YTD
39.45%
6M
40.27%
1Y
60.82%
3Y*
27.26%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH2.L vs. TRIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CSH2.L
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
2.01%4.67%5.61%4.72%1.54%0.12%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
39.45%7.75%16.84%46.28%-17.87%37.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH2.L and TRIN is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.01

The correlation between CSH2.L and TRIN shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSH2.L vs. TRIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH2.L
CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIN
TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH2.L vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSH2.LTRINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+11.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.73

1.49

+3.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

27.75

5.07

+22.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

163.55

12.90

+150.65

CSH2.L vs. TRIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio is 8.32, which is higher than the TRIN Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH2.L and TRIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSH2.L vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH2.L drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum TRIN drawdown of -39.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH2.L and TRIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSH2.LTRINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-39.00%

+38.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-12.06%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.29%

-18.68%

+18.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.29%

-39.00%

+38.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-7.69%

+7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

4.73%

-4.70%

Volatility

CSH2.L vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) is 0.06%, while Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that CSH2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSH2.LTRINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

7.73%

-7.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.20%

16.22%

-16.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53%

21.13%

-20.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.56%

26.77%

-26.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.44%

26.98%

-26.54%

Dividends

CSH2.L vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison

CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CSH2.L
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
19.93%13.92%14.10%14.04%21.32%7.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSH2.L and TRIN have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSH2.L and TRIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer