CSGP vs. ROST
CSGP (CoStar Group, Inc.) and ROST (Ross Stores, Inc.) are both stocks. CSGP operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while ROST operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CSGP returned 4.54%/yr vs 17.29%/yr for ROST. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSGP vs. ROST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a -51.16% return, which is significantly lower than ROST's 33.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has underperformed ROST with an annualized return of 4.54%, while ROST has yielded a comparatively higher 17.29% annualized return.
CSGP
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- -51.16%
- 6M
- -51.87%
- 1Y
- -59.54%
- 3Y*
- -26.28%
- 5Y*
- -17.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
ROST
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 12.82%
- YTD
- 33.85%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- 1Y
- 83.78%
- 3Y*
- 32.49%
- 5Y*
- 16.14%
- 10Y*
- 17.29%
CSGP vs. ROST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSGP CoStar Group, Inc. | -51.16% | -6.08% | -18.08% | 13.08% | -2.21% | -14.50% | 54.48% | 77.36% | 13.60% | 57.54% |
ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 33.85% | 20.41% | 10.39% | 20.64% | 2.94% | -6.03% | 5.81% | 41.72% | 4.78% | 23.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSGP and ROST is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSGP and ROST has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CSGP:
$13.60B
ROST:
$77.14B
CSGP:
$0.06
ROST:
$7.15
CSGP:
544.46
ROST:
33.57
CSGP:
4.04
ROST:
3.27
CSGP:
1.72
ROST:
11.69
CSGP:
$3.41B
ROST:
$23.78B
CSGP:
$2.64B
ROST:
$4.95B
CSGP:
$284.20M
ROST:
$3.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSGP vs. ROST — Risk / Return Rank
CSGP
ROST
CSGP vs. ROST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSGP | ROST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.66 | 1.63 | -0.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 10.52 | -11.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 38.37 | -39.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSGP vs. ROST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -71.11%, smaller than the maximum ROST drawdown of -82.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and ROST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSGP | ROST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.11% | -82.23% | +11.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.11% | -7.79% | -59.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.41% | -21.08% | -46.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.07% | -44.13% | -23.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.07% | -51.41% | -16.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.07% | 0.00% | -67.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -17.93% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.50% | 2.25% | +37.25% |
Volatility
CSGP vs. ROST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) is 9.56%, while Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that CSGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSGP | ROST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 10.90% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.06% | 18.51% | +15.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.69% | 24.63% | +14.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.68% | 29.55% | +5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.63% | 31.62% | +1.01% |
Dividends
CSGP vs. ROST - Dividend Comparison
CSGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSGP CoStar Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 0.71% | 0.90% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 0.23% | 1.10% | 1.08% | 0.80% | 0.82% | 4.59% |
Financials
CSGP vs. ROST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoStar Group, Inc. and Ross Stores, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSGP vs. ROST - Profitability Comparison
CSGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 701.00M and revenue of 897.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.
ROST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ross Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CSGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.00M and revenue of 897.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
ROST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ross Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 804.03M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
CSGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoStar Group, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 897.00M, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.
ROST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ross Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 649.96M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSGP and ROST have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROST has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to CSGP (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSGP dropped -71.11% vs ROST's -82.23%.
ROST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSGP and ROST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer