ROST vs. LULU
Compare and contrast key facts about Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ROST or LULU.
Correlation
The correlation between ROST and LULU is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ROST vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ROST:
0.53
LULU:
-0.66
ROST:
0.96
LULU:
-0.78
ROST:
1.12
LULU:
0.90
ROST:
0.75
LULU:
-0.48
ROST:
1.86
LULU:
-0.73
ROST:
5.98%
LULU:
35.39%
ROST:
20.87%
LULU:
38.94%
ROST:
-82.23%
LULU:
-92.24%
ROST:
-4.89%
LULU:
-27.23%
Fundamentals
ROST:
$49.77B
LULU:
$47.57B
ROST:
$6.36
LULU:
$13.84
ROST:
23.72
LULU:
28.22
ROST:
1.98
LULU:
1.54
ROST:
$21.24B
LULU:
$10.18B
ROST:
$5.95B
LULU:
$5.99B
ROST:
$3.09B
LULU:
$2.71B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROST achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -27.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ROST has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of 13.68%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 21.45% annualized return.
ROST
8.44%
5.41%
0.42%
10.45%
6.25%
13.68%
LULU
-27.23%
20.20%
18.78%
-26.59%
10.10%
21.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ROST vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ROST vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
ROST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 0.99% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 0.23% | 0.88% | 1.08% | 0.80% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 0.85% | 0.91% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROST vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROST drawdown since its inception was -82.23%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROST and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ROST vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) is 7.37%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 17.49%. This indicates that ROST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ROST vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ross Stores, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities