ROST vs. LULU

In the year-to-date period, ROST achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than LULU's 1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ROST has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of 13.50%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 20.02% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ROST Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROST and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ROST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ROST drawdown since its inception was -82.23%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROST and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) is 5.92%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that ROST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ross Stores, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.