CSGP vs. ACWI
CSGP (CoStar Group, Inc.) is a stock, while ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Over the past 10 years, CSGP returned 3.29%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for ACWI. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CSGP vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSGP achieves a -54.83% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 11.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CSGP has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 3.29%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.50% annualized return.
CSGP
- 1D
- 6.60%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- 6M
- -52.08%
- YTD
- -54.83%
- 1Y
- -64.33%
- 3Y*
- -30.54%
- 5Y*
- -19.05%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
CSGP vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSGP CoStar Group, Inc. | -54.83% | -6.08% | -18.08% | 13.08% | -2.21% | -14.50% | 54.48% | 77.36% | 13.60% | 57.54% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 11.23% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSGP and ACWI is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSGP and ACWI has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSGP vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
CSGP
ACWI
CSGP vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSGP | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.66 | 1.30 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 2.35 | -3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | 10.02 | -11.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSGP vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSGP drawdown since its inception was -72.25%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGP and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSGP | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.25% | -56.00% | -16.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.41% | -9.73% | -61.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.68% | -16.55% | -55.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.25% | -26.42% | -45.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.25% | -33.53% | -38.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.55% | -1.62% | -67.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -8.57% | -13.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.51% | 2.27% | +42.24% |
Volatility
CSGP vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) has a higher volatility of 16.04% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.85%. This indicates that CSGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSGP | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.04% | 3.85% | +12.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.10% | 11.53% | +23.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.40% | 13.72% | +27.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 16.21% | +19.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 17.04% | +15.87% |
Dividends
CSGP vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
CSGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.44% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
CSGP CoStar Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSGP and ACWI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSGP has higher volatility (16.04%) compared to ACWI (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSGP dropped -72.25% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSGP and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer