CSCS vs. TSLZ
CSCS (Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSCS charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
CSCS vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCS achieves a -42.32% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -3.24% return.
CSCS
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -28.69%
- YTD
- -42.32%
- 6M
- -41.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -16.87%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -3.97%
- 1Y
- -65.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSCS vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | -42.32% | -11.22% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -3.24% | -61.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCS and TSLZ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCS vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
CSCS
TSLZ
CSCS vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSCS | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.67 | -0.67 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
CSCS vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCS drawdown since its inception was -50.80%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCS and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCS | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.80% | -99.11% | +48.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.26% | -98.98% | +48.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.70% | -75.39% | +61.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 60.77% | — |
Volatility
CSCS vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCS | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 55.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.62% | 91.68% | -61.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.62% | 116.96% | -86.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.62% | 116.96% | -86.34% |
CSCS vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCS vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
CSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than TSLZ's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | 4.02% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.71% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCS and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSCS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSCS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
CSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.71% for TSLZ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for CSCS and 1.05% for TSLZ.
Find the right allocation for CSCS and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer