CSCS vs. SARK
CSCS (Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSCS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
CSCS vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCS achieves a -42.32% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -6.78% return.
CSCS
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -28.69%
- YTD
- -42.32%
- 6M
- -41.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- -30.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSCS vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | -42.32% | -11.22% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.78% | -13.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCS and SARK is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCS vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
CSCS
SARK
CSCS vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSCS | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.67 | -0.24 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
CSCS vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCS drawdown since its inception was -50.80%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCS and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCS | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.80% | -81.07% | +30.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -40.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.26% | -79.42% | +29.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.70% | -46.46% | +32.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.47% | — |
Volatility
CSCS vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCS | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.62% | 35.91% | -5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.62% | 56.24% | -25.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.62% | 56.24% | -25.62% |
CSCS vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCS vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
CSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than SARK's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | 4.02% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.02% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCS and SARK have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for CSCS.
CSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 3.02% for SARK.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for CSCS and 0.75% for SARK.
Find the right allocation for CSCS and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer